Home / Science & Technology / Scientists Are Creating Mock Meteorite Crashes in a Lab. Here’s Why.

Scientists Are Creating Mock Meteorite Crashes in a Lab. Here’s Why.

The micro-structure of the mineral albite before being rapidly compressed. This image shows a section 0.036 millimeters across.

Credit: Lars Ehm/Stony Brook University


Hundreds or millions of years after a meteorite smashes into Earth, researchers are left analyzing the impact site to figure out what happened. New research simulated such impacts in the lab, smashing samples together between diamond anvils and tracking how impact-site materials change when compressed at different rates.


By learning about ancient meteorite impacts, researchers can better understand how Earth and other solar system bodies formed and evolved. And by analyzing specific impact sites, researchers hope to learn details such as the highest temperatures and pressures reached in the smashup.


Researchers in the past have classified impacts based on changes to three types of minerals often found in impact craters (and in planetary crust in general), the scientists said in a statement about the new work. These minerals, which are in the feldspar group, consist of albite, anorthite and plagioclase (the latter is a mixture of the first two). When these minerals undergo an impact, they lose some of their ordered crystal structure, and the new work used X-ray diffraction — measuring powerful X-rays passing through the substances — to track how their atomic structures change as they’re rapidly compressed, like they are in a meteorite impact. [Related: Superdense Alien Ice Formed in a (Laser) Flash]


“In our experiment we used gas- or actuator-controlled diamond anvil cells to rapidly compress our samples, while we continuously collect X-ray diffraction patterns,” Melissa Sims, a geoscientist at Stony Brook University in New York and lead author on the new work, said in the statement. “This allows us to monitor the changes in the atomic structure during the complete compression and decompression cycle, and not only at the start and end of the experiment as in previous so-called recovery experiments.”

The micro-structure of the albite sample after compression to 44 gigapascals (GPa) at a rate of 0.1 GPa per second. This image shows a section 0.007 millimeters across.

The micro-structure of the albite sample after compression to 44 gigapascals (GPa) at a rate of 0.1 GPa per second. This image shows a section 0.007 millimeters across.

Credit: Lars Ehm/Stony Brook University


The researchers compressed the minerals to 80 gigapascals of pressure, which is roughly equivalent to 80,000 times Earth’s atmospheric pressure at sea level, and varied the compression rate to see differences in how the minerals reacted. They noticed that the rate of compression had a big impact on when the minerals lost their crystal structure — when compressed more quickly, the structure was completely lost at a lower pressure than when compressed slowly.


This means measuring the level of structure lost in these minerals when found at impact sites might not be enough to estimate the peak pressure and temperature at the time the object hit, the researchers said. But as they investigate more about how minerals change under impact conditions, researchers should be able to pull more information from long-ago impact sites.

The micro-structure of the albite sample after compression to 46 gigapascals (GPa) at a rate of 35 GPa per second. This image shows a section 0.007 millimeters across.

The micro-structure of the albite sample after compression to 46 gigapascals (GPa) at a rate of 35 GPa per second. This image shows a section 0.007 millimeters across.

Credit: Lars Ehm/Stony Brook University


So, though it doesn’t help pinpoint specific temperatures and pressures in this case, the use of this technology — and the increasing availability of powerful X-ray sources and X-ray detector technology — is promising for learning more about how impacts work, the researchers said.


The new work was detailed Feb. 1 in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.


Email Sarah Lewin at [email protected] or follow her @SarahExplains. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook. Original article on Space.com.




Source link

About Linda Risty

Check Also

two pigeons, each sitting in a cubbyhole

Photons suggest the weird quantum pigeonhole paradox is real

Quantum pigeons don’t like to share. In keeping with a mathematical concept known as the …